You have got to remember what a risk an adult takes by coming back into education."Students enrolling at the college are given a list of charitable trusts to write to asking for donations. "We have cut all our classes, but when you are talking about adult students, with no achievements, they really need the maximum in tutorial support. "If there ever was any freedom both to claim benefit and train, they believe they would be talking about billions and billions of pounds." Ms Zera says it looks as if an apparently contradictory Government stance is a nattempt to prevent the benefit system from becoming a backdoor form of student grant.Her college staff have spent the summer shrinking and tailoring their courses to fit in with the 16-hour requirement. We will lose a minimum of 100 to 300 students through this."In May 1995, Gillian Shephard called for 60 per cent of the workforce to have either vocational qualifications or two A-levels, by the year 2000.But while the education and employment secretary was waving these ambitious targets for adult education around with one hand, opponents claim she was quietly knocking away all financial support with the other."What is behind it all, I think, is that the Treasury is running scared." says Ms Zera. "Now there's a danger that the people we can help will run away from us.

There is a real demand for skills, but the number of jobs available for people with absolutely no training has gone right down."In the past, adults have made up more than half of the 6,000 students at her college, and more than 40 per cent arrive with no qualifications. The heads of further education colleges fear the introduction of both changes in tandem will cause a drastic drop in the number of adults signing up for study, something which will in turn put a sizeable chunk of their own state funding in jeopardy.In February last year the changes were presented as a simplification of the rules, an ironing out of a few anomalies: but, with an anxious eye on adult enrolments this week, the principal of Tower Hamlets College in East London, Annette Zera, says the changes are an example of government hypocrisy."After all, Britain lags well behind its neighbours with the size of its skilled workforce, and that's where the jobs are. "I told them I didn't really want it because of my college course and they said I would have to accept the next full-time job that came up."The part-time student's problems will be compounded by a second cutback being brought in tomorrow: the number of hours an unemployed person can study each week without being deemed a full-time student, and thus losing benefit, is being reduced from 21 to 16.Known as Regulation 11, this is likely to loom large over both students and teachers this term. But she has found it difficult to steer her way through benefit restrictions."After I was called for a Restart interview the other week, I was offered a full-time job at pounds 3.05 an hour doing shift work at McDonalds," she says. Determined to do better than simply living off the state at her parents' home in Essex, she came to London for proper training. They are stepping up measures so it will be much more difficult for a student on benefit to stay on a course. Unsuitable jobs will be offered to part-time students more and more often as a test of whether they are really available for work."In theory, the Government is right behind people like Kelly.